I am very disappointed in 96% of you.
I read this study last week where participants in a study were given an option to shock someone in another room for money. Amazingly, 96% of the participants chose to shock the person in the other room. And not just once. Most people continued to shock the person over and over again for more money.
Here’s the worst part of the study; each shock was worth exactly one British pound, up to a maximum of 20 shocks. In US dollars, that’s worth about $1.63 per shock, for a maximum potential gain of $32.60.
Let me just tell you that if you were to shock another living human being for what amounts to a 20 oz. Coke at the vending machine at my work, we cannot be friends. It’s wrong no matter how much money is involved, but if two bucks can convince you to do something truly reprehensible, you should really see a therapist.
I don’t know the specifics about the participants in the study. Maybe they were homeless and poor and hungry. Maybe that $1.63 was going to help them buy their first decent meal in weeks. In this case, it’s still wrong and I’m still disgusted, but at least I could at least see where they were coming from. Unfortunately, I doubt this is the case. I think it was just a situation where people saw an easy way to get some money, so they took it and damned the consequences.
The point of the study was to compare the reactions of people put in a hypothetical situation to people put in a real life situation. Hypothetically, only 36% of people said they would give a shock. Why, then, did 96% of people in the situation with real money at stake give the shock?
I believe the problem with these people is that they don’t lead a principled life.
Leading a Principled Life
When your life isn’t guided by principles, you can justify any action. It is easy to rationalize a decision to fit any situation. In this case, “It probably won’t hurt this guy too bad, and I could use the money, so why not?” People who make decisions by continually rationalizing all of their actions, good or bad, are dangerous. They can be talked into doing just about anything.
I can say with absolute certainty that I wouldn’t give the shock. Why am I so sure? It’s in my mission statement. In fact, it’s the very first entry:
I expect to pass this way but once. Any good, therefore, that I can do or any kindness I can show to any fellow creature, let me do it now. Let me not defer or neglect it, for I shall not pass this way again. -Stephen Grellet
Game over. It simply isn’t possible to rationalize a decision to shock someone for money when you have a personal mission statement with kindness as a core pillar. As long as I stay true to my mission statement, no amount of justifying or convincing will work. I have to be kind and deny the shock and the money.
This is why my mission statement is so important to me, and why I think everyone should have one. It not only makes your life more consistent, but it makes it easier. You no longer have to struggle internally to make difficult decisions; whenever you are faced with a choice, just think back to your mission statement and allow those principles to make the decision for you.
If you don’t have a personal mission statement, I suggest you make one. Feel free to take a look at mine and use it as an example, or make your own however you like. I used quotes from famous people because they are all much smarter than me. However, there’s no right or wrong way to do it; the important thing is just that you write it down.
Now that we are talking about it, I should update my mission statement. I want to add, “I will always punch people in the throat who shock strangers for less than $2.” I think that’s a good one.
Question of the Day: Imagine the same study, but instead of shocking a person, they were shocking a dog. How do you think it would have changed the results, and why?
Kevin McKee is an entrepreneur, IT guru, and personal finance leader. In addition to his writing, Kevin is the head of IT at Buildingstars, Co-Founder of Padmission, and organizer of Laravel STL. He is also the creator of www.contributetoopensource.com. When he’s not working, Kevin enjoys podcasting about movies and spending time with his wife and four children.
I think the results would have changed. I personally, love dogs more than people. I wouldn’t have shocked a dog. I can’t say I would have necessarily have shocked a person either for money. I don’t wish to harm another person. But, if it was someone I dislike, I probably could make myself do it, especially if I was making money of it. But, I would have to make a decent amount of money. I’m a gold digger, what can I say?
I think the dogs would get a lot less shocks. It’s amazing how cruel people can be to other people.
Wow. I don’t want to be friends with those 96% of participants either. No, I can honestly say that I’d be in the 4% – I guarantee it based on everything I believe.
BUT, I do know a few people I’d shock for free…
Shocking another person (inflickting pain, even if it’s a very small amount) for money? What’s wrong with people?!! Needless to say, I agree with your point of view, Kevin.
I’m not sure what would happen if a dog were substituted for a person in the study. On one hand, I’d say the number of “yeses” would go up because dogs **should** be lower than humans on the love and respect scale, but so many people these days have an overflowing amount of love and compassion for their pets — and less of the same for other humans — that I wouldn’t be surprised if the number of “yeses” went down.
Cheers,
Thomas
I’m pretty frugal, I don’t think I would pay that much to shock someone… Depends! Is my ex in that group of shockees?
Actually, pain is not that big a deal. Hurts, is over fairly quickly, with a small residual muscle ache. I would volunteer for that study if it were of real scientific value to me. So if I was willing to take a shock, I’d have to be willing to give one, too. I also spent some time playing with electric fences as a child. Don’t go out in the field and pee on one….
I see one flaw in the principled life. It sounds great in theory (which is why 64% said they wouldnt do it on paper), but after all we are all human.
If Jessica Alba presented 1 billion dollars to you naked would you shock somebody with a 9 volt battery? How about if it was your life or poking somebody in the arm with a plastic fork?
Depending on the stakes involved I would be in the 96%….but not for $1.63.